Product
Seven named auditors, NVDA-backed screen reader simulation, source-level remediation guidance — and a procurement-ready Accessibility Conformance Report on every run.
Every page in scope is traversed the way a human IAAP-credentialed auditor would traverse it: keyboard-only navigation, focus order, contrast measurement, ARIA validation, screen reader output capture, and source-code review of the rendered DOM.
No overlay widget. No "instant compliance" claim. No anonymous AI-as-human fiction. We disclose what the AI did and where humans should pair-review.
Meet your AI auditors
Each auditor specialises in one WCAG criterion family. You can see which one reviewed your site, what it ran, and where humans should pair-review. This is how we make AI-led auditing defensible.
AI auditor · Forms & ARIA
AI auditor specialised in forms, validation, and ARIA semantics — trained on 12,000 labelled WCAG findings across 420+ enterprise audits.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · Color & Contrast
AI auditor for colour, contrast, and visual perception — applying both WCAG 2.x luminance and APCA-equivalent perceptual checks.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · Keyboard & Focus
AI auditor for keyboard operation and focus management — simulating Tab / Shift+Tab / Arrow / Enter / Space / Escape interactions across the entire page tree.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · Screen Reader Simulation
AI auditor running NVDA-backed simulation — produces actual screen-reader output transcripts as part of every audit report.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · Media & Captions
AI auditor for video, audio, and media accessibility — captioning accuracy, audio descriptions, transcripts, and media player operability.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · Mobile Accessibility
AI auditor for mobile web and native app accessibility — testing target sizes, orientation, reflow, and platform AT (TalkBack / VoiceOver) compatibility.
WCAG coverage
AI auditor · PDF & Documents
AI auditor for PDF, Word, PowerPoint and EPUB accessibility — applying PDF/UA-1 (ISO 14289-1) and WCAG 2.x criteria to document content.
WCAG coverage
Why this matters
Most "AI accessibility" tools render their model as a single anonymous blob — you cannot tell what was machine-tested vs human-reviewed, and the result is harder to defend in procurement, court, or EU market surveillance. We split the work across seven named specialists with disclosed scope so the audit output reads — and stands up to review — like one produced by an IAAP-credentialed team.
The audit cycle, on AI time
The same three phases every audit team runs — automated, IAAP-formatted, repeatable, and integrated with the tools your engineering team already uses.
Find everything the automation can find — and the 70% it cannot.
AI auditors traverse your site like a human auditor would: keyboard, screen reader simulation, contrast, ARIA, forms, media. Static rule scanning is the floor, not the ceiling.
Learn moreEvery finding mapped to WCAG, with severity, evidence, and fix.
Each issue references its WCAG 2.2 success criterion, includes a screen-reader transcript or screenshot as evidence, and ships with a specific source-level remediation recommendation.
Learn moreIAAP-aligned report. VPAT 2.5-ready. Defensible.
Your auditor delivers the same Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) format used by Fortune 500 a11y teams. Procurement-ready, court-citable, downloadable as PDF and JSON.
Learn moreFree audit · no card
Drop your URL and email. We scan up to 50 pages, show the first three findings inline, and email the full IAAP-format report to you and the founders.
Integrations
Frameworks, CI, ticketing, IDEs, design, CMS, cloud. 33 live integrations and counting.
FAQ
Cited answers. Sourced. Updated as standards and case law change.
A full Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) in the IAAP-aligned VPAT 2.5 INT format, delivered as PDF and machine-readable JSON. Each finding cites the WCAG success criterion violated, the severity, evidence (screenshot or screen-reader transcript), the page and selector, and a source-level remediation recommendation.
Yes. ACRs in this format are routinely accepted by procurement, courts, EU market surveillance, and the US DOJ as evidence of testing. AccessivePath ships the ACR alongside the underlying evidence — keyboard traversal logs, NVDA transcripts, contrast measurements — that human reviewers can verify.
Yes. The Sora auditor drives a real NVDA instance (Windows VM); we also pair-test with JAWS and VoiceOver. The transcripts become part of your report and can be replayed as audio evidence.
axe-core and Lighthouse are excellent automated rule engines (we use axe-core internally). They cover roughly 25–30% of WCAG criteria reliably. AccessivePath layers human-grade evaluation on top — keyboard traversal, screen reader simulation, ARIA semantics review, and meaningful-content checks — and produces the IAAP-format report axe and Lighthouse do not.
WCAG 2.0 / 2.1 / 2.2 (Levels A, AA and AAA), Section 508, EN 301 549, ADA Title II + III, EAA, AODA, ACA, RGAA, Unruh Act, and the Web Accessibility Directive.
Free audit on your live URL. No sign-up. IAAP-format report. Ready in hours.
founders@accessivepath.com · +977 9851094056
