comparison
RGAA vs Section 508
RGAA (Référentiel général d'amélioration de l'accessibilité, France, 2009) and Section 508 (Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, United States — federal government and federal contractors, 1998 (2017 Refresh)) are two of the most-referenced accessibility frameworks in digital compliance. This guide compares them side by side — jurisdiction, scope, conformance approach, penalties, and how a single audit can cover both simultaneously.
What is RGAA?
France's Référentiel général d'amélioration de l'accessibilité (RGAA) is the French government's national web accessibility methodology, currently at version 4.1, that operationalises EN 301 549 / WCAG 2.1 AA with 106 control tests and is mandatory for public-sector and (since the EAA transposition) large-private-sector French websites.
Maintainer
DINUM (Direction interministérielle du numérique)
Jurisdiction and enforcement
France. DINUM; ARCOM for audiovisual.
What is Section 508?
Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act requires US federal agencies, federal contractors, and recipients of federal funds to make their information and communications technology (ICT) accessible to people with disabilities, with conformance benchmarked against WCAG 2.0 Level AA via the 2017 Refresh.
Maintainer
US Access Board
Jurisdiction and enforcement
United States — federal government and federal contractors. GSA, agencies, US Court of Federal Claims.
RGAA vs Section 508 — the key differences
The principal difference is jurisdictional: RGAA applies in France, while Section 508 applies in United States — federal government and federal contractors. RGAA is maintained by DINUM (Direction interministérielle du numérique); Section 508 is maintained by US Access Board. The standards differ on scope, conformance grading, and penalty structure — but a well-designed accessibility programme can satisfy both simultaneously by adopting the strictest applicable requirement and cross-mapping findings.
Scope
RGAA covers: Public-sector websites, Large private-sector websites (under EAA transposition). Section 508 covers: Federal-agency websites and applications, Federal-contractor ICT, ICT procured with federal funds.
Penalties
RGAA: Up to €50,000 administrative fine. Section 508: Procurement disqualification.
How to comply with both at once
Adopt the stricter applicable conformance level — typically WCAG 2.2 Level AA — as your engineering baseline. Audit against that baseline once, then cross-map findings to both RGAA and Section 508 specific requirements. A single Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) using VPAT 2.5 INT can document both.
When you might need just one
If you operate exclusively in France and have no cross-border procurement exposure, you may only need RGAA. The same applies in reverse for Section 508. For organisations selling cross-border, into the EU or US public sector, the safer default is to plan to both simultaneously.
Sources
- RGAA 4.1 — DINUM
- Section508.gov — GSA
- Section 508 Standards (ICT Refresh) — US Access Board
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Cited answers. Sourced. Updated as standards and case law change.
Is RGAA stricter than Section 508?
Neither standard is uniformly "stricter" — they cover different regulatory domains. RGAA is more prescriptive about public-sector websites; Section 508 about federal-agency websites and applications. For organisations exposed to both, a unified WCAG 2.2 AA baseline typically satisfies the technical requirements of both.
Can a single audit satisfy RGAA and Section 508?
Yes. Both standards ultimately reference WCAG-aligned criteria. A combined audit with cross-mapped findings can produce documentation acceptable to both regulators.
Which jurisdictions enforce RGAA?
France. DINUM; ARCOM for audiovisual.
Which jurisdictions enforce Section 508?
United States — federal government and federal contractors. GSA, agencies, US Court of Federal Claims.
What happens if I am not compliant with RGAA?
Up to €50,000 administrative fine
What happens if I am not compliant with Section 508?
Procurement disqualification Contract termination or modification Bid protests at GAO and US Court of Federal Claims Reputational and downstream civil-rights exposure under Sections 501 and 504
Stop guessing. Get the audit a Fortune 500 a11y team would have written.
Free audit on your live URL. No sign-up. IAAP-format report. Ready in hours.
founders@accessivepath.com · +977 9851094056