comparison
EAA vs EN 301 549
EAA (European Accessibility Act, European Union (all 27 member states), 2019) and EN 301 549 (EN 301 549 — Accessibility requirements for ICT products and services, European Union (harmonised standard), 2014 (v3.2.1 current)) are two of the most-referenced accessibility frameworks in digital compliance. This guide compares them side by side — jurisdiction, scope, conformance approach, penalties, and how a single audit can cover both simultaneously.
What is EAA?
The European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) is the EU's prescriptive accessibility law that takes effect 28 June 2025, requiring covered products and services — banking, e-commerce, transport, audiovisual media, ebooks and computer hardware — to meet harmonised accessibility requirements derived from EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA.
Maintainer
European Commission
Jurisdiction and enforcement
European Union (all 27 member states). Per member state, via national transpositions.
What is EN 301 549?
EN 301 549 is the harmonised European standard for digital accessibility, maintained jointly by ETSI, CEN, and CENELEC, that incorporates WCAG 2.1 AA for web and mobile content and adds requirements for hardware, software, documentation and support — and is the technical reference for both the European Accessibility Act and the Web Accessibility Directive.
Maintainer
ETSI / CEN / CENELEC
Jurisdiction and enforcement
European Union (harmonised standard). Referenced by EAA and Web Accessibility Directive.
EAA vs EN 301 549 — the key differences
The principal difference is jurisdictional: EAA applies in European Union (all 27 member states), while EN 301 549 applies in European Union (harmonised standard). EAA is maintained by European Commission; EN 301 549 is maintained by ETSI / CEN / CENELEC. The standards differ on scope, conformance grading, and penalty structure — but a well-designed accessibility programme can satisfy both simultaneously by adopting the strictest applicable requirement and cross-mapping findings.
Scope
EAA covers: Consumer banking services, E-commerce (B2C online sales), Air, rail, water, bus passenger transport, Audiovisual media services and devices, Electronic communications services, E-readers and ebooks, Self-service terminals (ATMs, ticket machines), Consumer computer hardware and operating systems. EN 301 549 covers: Web content, Non-web documents (PDF, EPUB), Software (native apps, OSes), Hardware (kiosks, devices), Documentation, ICT support services.
Penalties
EAA: Germany: up to €100,000 administrative fine + suspension of service. EN 301 549: Inherited from referencing law (WAD or EAA per member state).
How to comply with both at once
Adopt the stricter applicable conformance level — typically WCAG 2.2 Level AA — as your engineering baseline. Audit against that baseline once, then cross-map findings to both EAA and EN 301 549 specific requirements. A single Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) using VPAT 2.5 INT can document both.
When you might need just one
If you operate exclusively in European Union (all 27 member states) and have no cross-border procurement exposure, you may only need EAA. The same applies in reverse for EN 301 549. For organisations selling cross-border, into the EU or US public sector, the safer default is to plan to both simultaneously.
Sources
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) — European Union
- EN 301 549 v3.2.1 — ETSI
- EN 301 549 v3.2.1 — ETSI
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Cited answers. Sourced. Updated as standards and case law change.
Is EAA stricter than EN 301 549?
Neither standard is uniformly "stricter" — they cover different regulatory domains. EAA is more prescriptive about consumer banking services; EN 301 549 about web content. For organisations exposed to both, a unified WCAG 2.2 AA baseline typically satisfies the technical requirements of both.
Can a single audit satisfy EAA and EN 301 549?
Yes. Both standards ultimately reference WCAG-aligned criteria. A combined audit with cross-mapped findings can produce documentation acceptable to both regulators.
Which jurisdictions enforce EAA?
European Union (all 27 member states). Per member state, via national transpositions.
Which jurisdictions enforce EN 301 549?
European Union (harmonised standard). Referenced by EAA and Web Accessibility Directive.
What happens if I am not compliant with EAA?
Germany: up to €100,000 administrative fine + suspension of service France: up to €75,000 + daily penalty up to €3,000 Italy: up to €40,000 + product/service withdrawal Ireland: up to €60,000 / 18 months imprisonment Spain: up to €1,000,000 for repeat serious infringements
What happens if I am not compliant with EN 301 549?
Inherited from referencing law (WAD or EAA per member state)
Stop guessing. Get the audit a Fortune 500 a11y team would have written.
Free audit on your live URL. No sign-up. IAAP-format report. Ready in hours.
founders@accessivepath.com · +977 9851094056