comparison
EAA vs ACA
EAA (European Accessibility Act, European Union (all 27 member states), 2019) and ACA (Accessible Canada Act, Canada — federally regulated entities, 2019) are two of the most-referenced accessibility frameworks in digital compliance. This guide compares them side by side — jurisdiction, scope, conformance approach, penalties, and how a single audit can cover both simultaneously.
What is EAA?
The European Accessibility Act (Directive (EU) 2019/882) is the EU's prescriptive accessibility law that takes effect 28 June 2025, requiring covered products and services — banking, e-commerce, transport, audiovisual media, ebooks and computer hardware — to meet harmonised accessibility requirements derived from EN 301 549 and WCAG 2.1 AA.
Maintainer
European Commission
Jurisdiction and enforcement
European Union (all 27 member states). Per member state, via national transpositions.
What is ACA?
The Accessible Canada Act (ACA, 2019) requires federally regulated entities — federal government, banks, telecom, broadcasting, transportation — to identify, remove and prevent accessibility barriers, with the explicit goal of "a Canada without barriers by 2040" and detailed regulations layered on top including the ICT regulations referencing EN 301 549.
Maintainer
Accessibility Standards Canada
Jurisdiction and enforcement
Canada — federally regulated entities. Accessibility Commissioner; CRTC for telecom; CTA for transportation.
EAA vs ACA — the key differences
The principal difference is jurisdictional: EAA applies in European Union (all 27 member states), while ACA applies in Canada — federally regulated entities. EAA is maintained by European Commission; ACA is maintained by Accessibility Standards Canada. The standards differ on scope, conformance grading, and penalty structure — but a well-designed accessibility programme can satisfy both simultaneously by adopting the strictest applicable requirement and cross-mapping findings.
Scope
EAA covers: Consumer banking services, E-commerce (B2C online sales), Air, rail, water, bus passenger transport, Audiovisual media services and devices, Electronic communications services, E-readers and ebooks, Self-service terminals (ATMs, ticket machines), Consumer computer hardware and operating systems. ACA covers: Federally regulated workplaces, Federal services (incl. digital), Federally regulated transportation and telecom.
Penalties
EAA: Germany: up to €100,000 administrative fine + suspension of service. ACA: Administrative monetary penalties up to C$250,000 per violation.
How to comply with both at once
Adopt the stricter applicable conformance level — typically WCAG 2.2 Level AA — as your engineering baseline. Audit against that baseline once, then cross-map findings to both EAA and ACA specific requirements. A single Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) using VPAT 2.5 INT can document both.
When you might need just one
If you operate exclusively in European Union (all 27 member states) and have no cross-border procurement exposure, you may only need EAA. The same applies in reverse for ACA. For organisations selling cross-border, into the EU or US public sector, the safer default is to plan to both simultaneously.
Sources
- Directive (EU) 2019/882 (European Accessibility Act) — European Union
- EN 301 549 v3.2.1 — ETSI
- Accessible Canada Act — Government of Canada
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Cited answers. Sourced. Updated as standards and case law change.
Is EAA stricter than ACA?
Neither standard is uniformly "stricter" — they cover different regulatory domains. EAA is more prescriptive about consumer banking services; ACA about federally regulated workplaces. For organisations exposed to both, a unified WCAG 2.2 AA baseline typically satisfies the technical requirements of both.
Can a single audit satisfy EAA and ACA?
Yes. Both standards ultimately reference WCAG-aligned criteria. A combined audit with cross-mapped findings can produce documentation acceptable to both regulators.
Which jurisdictions enforce EAA?
European Union (all 27 member states). Per member state, via national transpositions.
Which jurisdictions enforce ACA?
Canada — federally regulated entities. Accessibility Commissioner; CRTC for telecom; CTA for transportation.
What happens if I am not compliant with EAA?
Germany: up to €100,000 administrative fine + suspension of service France: up to €75,000 + daily penalty up to €3,000 Italy: up to €40,000 + product/service withdrawal Ireland: up to €60,000 / 18 months imprisonment Spain: up to €1,000,000 for repeat serious infringements
What happens if I am not compliant with ACA?
Administrative monetary penalties up to C$250,000 per violation
Stop guessing. Get the audit a Fortune 500 a11y team would have written.
Free audit on your live URL. No sign-up. IAAP-format report. Ready in hours.
founders@accessivepath.com · +977 9851094056